Sunday, February 23, 2025

 

What was supposed to be a three day blitzkrieg is not going into year number three.

Russia historically has a problem on offense, but are psychotic on defense. 

They tried to hit Ukraine from two directions at once and it did not work.  Ukraine has fought hard and the war continues.  A lot of people (not sure how many) have died and this war appears to be a re-run of the First World War.

Hopefully, it is coming to an end as Trump replaces the ineefective Biden and it talking directly to Putin.  The Europeans are upset at not getting the recognition they feel they deserve and it seems Zelensky, whose term expired in April or October of last year (depending on your interpretation of Ukrainian law) is actually a dictator.

Lately, Trump and Zelensky have traded barbs, which is not a smart think for the Ukrainian leader (note the lack of title). 

There might be a lot of vested interests in keep the war going, even if it is one Russian and one Ukrainian shooting in the air three times before going back to their lines.  A lot of aid to Ukraine cannot be accounted for and the whole thing is looking like a money laundering operation.

 British Prime Minister Starmer is talking about sending 30k British soldiers to Ukraine as peacekeepers, but since that is half of Brtiain's army that does not seem like it would work.  Plus, Russia will not agree to have peacekeepers from NATO countries in Ukraine. Furthermore, Starmer want US air power on standby. 

    Can't see Trump going for that.

It also tells you how weak Britain is.

If you do put peacekeepers in there, they have to come from someplace outside NATO.

Russia is not going to give up any land.

Of course, look for European proposals to be non-starters since there seem to be many people making money off this.

The US and Russian adults are taking care of this.  Tell the European children to wait in another room and watch the Lion King or something.


Monday, February 10, 2025

Viva Las Gaza?

 

What do we do with Gaza?

If it is "rebuilt" back to what it was before, then all that happens is that another war ends up on the horizon.  We end up with the usual Middle Eastern problem of another war after one has just ended.

I don't know if Trump's idea of a Middle Eastern Las Vegas could work, but at least it is a thought outside the box to break the aforementioned war cycle.

If the United Nations was a solid functioning organization, it could take over the area and build what needs to be built.  But it is not.  Should the US walk into Gaza and run it?  I think that would a bad idea.

Still, out of the box thinking is the way to go here.  

 Beirut used to be the Paris of the Middle East until the civil war broke out in 1975.  Maybe Gaza could follow that path minus the civil war.  If Beirut gets rolling and gains its pre-civil war form, we can have a bit of competition. 

Its worth thinking about!

Even if we don't pursue this particular option, at least it is something different!