Friday, July 26, 2019

The Betsy Ross Flag

Here is a very good article on the Betsy Ross flag, created by Quakers, who were against slavery by the way.....

Opinion: In defense of the Betsy Ross flag

LINKEDINCOMMENTMORE
During Patriot Week, we fly flags that symbolize freedom, each one representing a foundational principle derived from our Declaration of Independence.
Included among these is the Betsy Ross flag, though it is shunned as a symbol of oppression in some quarters.
The detractors of this flag are misinformed, shallow or just plain subversive. Let’s assume they are misinformed:
It's true: America’s past is bloodied, bruised and blemished with unjust wars, slavery, gender oppression discrimination and the genocide of Native Americans. But no nation is free from the sins of the past. 
Many point to Europe as a model to be followed and ignore the hundreds of millions victimized by the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, World War I, the French Reign of Terror, the centuries-old Protestant v. Catholic wars, Rome, imperialism, and the list goes on.
The rest of the world is no better. Entire civilizations have been wiped out by enemies. Going back far enough, every person on the planet is likely the descendant of someone who engaged in what we would consider today to be barbarism. 
So what does America and the Betsy Ross Flag have to offer?
Before the Declaration of Independence was adopted, no major nation on the Earth was a republic. That we established a form of government, in Lincoln’s words, “of the people, by the people, for the people” is more than enough to deserve praise in the history books. But there is more.
ADVERTISING
No nation in history was dedicated to the proposition that governments were instituted to protect the unalienable rights of the people. That remains true today. We believe that our rights come from the creator (or nature and nature’s law) — not as handouts at the whims of the rulers — and we have governments to secure those rights.
No nation embraced the idea of a limited government, establishing a limited central (federal) authority focused on national issues, while leaving to local governments (states) matters closer to home, providing both liberty and good governance. 
No government wrote down their fundamental law. We have the oldest Constitution in the world. Certainly none allowed the courts to strike down laws and actions in violation of the Constitution. The denigration of the rule of law was a centerpiece of why we declared independence, and it is the linchpin of our Constitution. 
No nation empowered the people through their representatives, invited them to help draft and debate the fundamental law, and required ratification of a written constitution to embody and establish a social compact. 
No nation had established an amendment process to fix and improve the fundamental law and ensured elections to “vote the bums out” — that is, to alter or abolish the government.
And yes, no other nation had declared as a “self-evident truth” that all men are created equal — not a single one.
At the time, the Betsy Ross flag symbolized the most free nation in world history. That nation was not — and is not — perfect. It was and is bitterly flawed. But even in 1776 it was a monumental achievement. 
Those who fought for emancipation, women’s suffrage and civil rights harkened to the Declaration of Independence to make America live up to its promise. Frederick Douglass, Susan B. Anthony, and Martin Luther King Jr. saw themselves as the inheritors and defenders of the Spirit of ’76.
That flag was not a symbol of oppression, but of the most free nation on Earth — an indispensable stepping stone to the expansion of liberty on the world stage. We should celebrate, not denigrate it.

Monday, July 15, 2019

ICE raids

Immigration Customs and Enforcement began a large sweep across the nation looking for illegal immigrants with warrants.  It was strange that many mayors (LA and Chicago) refuse to cooperate with federal authorities enforcing federal law. That would make them accessories to a federal crime, a felony actually.

It is a felony to be in the country without authorization, yet some cities allow this and put illegal immigrants--by definition felons--on the welfare rolls.   What is the reasoning behind this?

Election fraud.

Pay them to vote for you.  Oldest trick in the book.

Instead of marching to the US border demanding change, "migrants" from Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras could do much better marching on Guatemala City, San Salvador, and Tegucigalpa and demand change in their own countries. 

Thursday, July 4, 2019

HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY!



HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY!!!

Sunday, June 30, 2019

Outside the box...

The "out of the box" diplomacy between President Trump and Chairman Kim continues.  Yesterday, Trump became the first US President to step into North Korea.  It was a surreal moment.

It was also largely unplanned and at the last minute, set up with a Tweet and ending with the President of the United States invited onto North Korean soil.

I was not sure what to think.

At least the United States, South Korea, and North Korea are talking to each other and are not shooting at each other.

I don't know where this will lead, but it is a kind of progress.  Slow, painfully slow, but moving forward nonetheless.  When you are dealing with nukes, you take that as a minor win at least.

I hope this ends with Korean unification one day.

It won't be quick and easy, so keep at it!

Saturday, June 29, 2019

A hard team to like...

Being a good American, I cheer for the US team.  Being a good American, I also do not like arrogant, posturing idiots.  Unfortunately, I just described the US women's soccer team.

They crushed Thailand 13-0 and instead of holding back when the game was clearly over, they piled on and had many over the top celebrations.  This is not the first time they have done this.  If I was the ref, it would have the last.  I would have red carded the captain.

If Megan Rapinoe does not want to visit the White House, fine.  Don't.  No big deal.  Putting an obscenity in your answer only makes you sound like a moron.

But consider this.

If you don't get along with the President, meeting him face to face would be a great opportunity to discuss differences and find a common ground.  That is what America needs now.

Liberalism is about tolerance and respecting differences. Liberals don't seem to get this, often opting for obscenity and violence.

And they can't fight...

Taking an invite from Alexandria Oscasio-Cortes to visit the House of Representatives instead  simply because you like her politics makes you as spiteful and hateful as that you claim to be against.

Think about it.



Saturday, June 22, 2019

Backing away from a war

Earlier this week, Iran shot down a US drone that they claim was over their airspace.  The United States says it was over international waters.  There had been some drone attacks on oil tankers and another attack on Japanese tankers from what might have been a torpedo attack.  President Trump was about to launch a retaliatory strike on Iran and decided to, at the last minute, call it off.

I think that was a wise move.

America does not need another war right now.

We have spent enough blood and treasure in the Middle East.

An unmanned drone that may or may not have been in Iranian airspace was shot down.  No one died.  As the President stated, a full-scale airstrike was not proportional and there was the potential for many civilian casualties. Other Presidents have launched attacks without such concerns, so this puts Trump a step ahead in humanitarian terms.  His strike on Syria in 2017 was aimed at planes on the runway and no one there was killed.  It seems to fit the pattern of selected strikes.

I am wondering who really wants a war with Iran.

My first thought was the oil companies. The price of oil did not move that much.  Had this been 2008, they would have skyrocketed.  Now the United Sate produces almost its own oil, so no need to intervene in the Middle Eastern oil fields.

Maybe someone in DC is thinking about the election next year, hoping for a war to influence the race?

That is sickening.

Fortunately, the airstrike was called off.

If the chickenhawks don't like it, let them lead the charge next time.





Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Packing the Supreme Court

The latest idiotic proposal from some members in Congress is to expand the Supreme Court to 15 judges.  That is not going to happen.  It can't especially with the current group of moron legislators.  Plus, there seems to be  a lot of stupid judges, but we will get to that another time.

There were originally six judges on the Supreme Court.  The Founding Fathers, for all their wisdom, did not foresee the rise of partisan politics, especially the vicious 21st Century kind. Still Federalist-Antifederalists could be pretty nasty too, so a seventh judge was added.  You also have to remember that judges back then would literally "ride the circuit".

As America expanded West, two more judges would be added to bring it to nine.

Franklin Roosevelt wanted to expand the Court to 15, but that never was going to happen even with a Democratic Senate supersuper majority of 74-19.  People don't like fooling around with the Constitution.

The Electoral College is not going anywhere either.